When something like this pops up, it's pretty natural to ask the question in our heads, and not think of the background info others actually need to answer that question.Īnd yes, for a TON of the questions that have been asked about Warp here over the last 5-6 years, my initial post would resolve the majority of them.
there was absolutely nothing in your initial post to give any indication of your knowledge, skills, experience, and media at hand plus hardware (all of which are important) to actually answer such a question. Nothing was intended to be demeaning about it. Which is exactly what my initial response was. No one popping in to attempt to help has any clue what your level of experience is, so especially first responses tend to be designed to fill in what may or may not be useful information across those what will be reading this thread over time. Some have done the major lifting on several long-form full Hollywood productions. Some people asking are so noob they barely can create a first project.
This forum has people of all knowledge levels and capabilities participating. Sorry if you found the answer demeaning, but really. Rendering out sections of a 4 minute video to avoid having to deal with a bug that should be fixed is an assinine and time consuming fix. "Use the least changes you can get by with?" HUH? Additionally this is just NOT the issue I'm having. Despite your claim that the effect is cpu/gpu intensive, it is not, spiking to a whopping 20% of cpu usage and less on the GPU.
The issue is that the clip will analyze but when I go back to said clip moments later in my edit, it has now reset and requires analyzing again. There are maybe 10-15 of these clips in my 4 minute video that I have decided to use WS on. I am using warp stabilizer on 2-3 second clips. It, along with the 'answer' here did not even attempt to answer the question the user had but rather was demeaning and condescending in the tone of 'you're using the software wrong.' So thanks for shouting down from your high horse and otherwise being completely useless. Neil - I actually had a question about stacking LUTs the other day and found a community topic where you 'answered' that question as well.
0 kommentar(er)
